To the editor:
Currently, in Los Angeles, we’re witnessing the consequences of constructing homes using wood framing rather than opting for tilt-up, steel-reinforced cement walls that offer superior fire resistance. This is highlighted in the article, “2 dead and more than 1,000 homes, businesses, other buildings destroyed in L.A. County fires,” from Jan. 8.
We, as citizens, are neglecting to demand building codes that genuinely prioritize fire safety. These codes can still comply with earthquake standards by using steel-reinforced cement, which is arguably more effective than traditional wood-frame construction.
Looking ahead, we should motivate those currently facing the loss of their homes to rebuild with fire resistance in mind. This approach should also appeal to insurance companies. As we advance our knowledge and experience with fire-resistant homes, they may eventually prove to be more cost-effective.
In one of my previous roles, the company operated out of a tilt-up cement facility, which I always felt was incredibly safe and fire-resistant. The technology for this exists; it’s just a matter of updating our building codes to support and encourage the construction of more fire-resistant buildings.
Douglas M. Chapman, Santa Ana
