To the editor:
It seems contributor Scott Jennings might not be fully aware of the current situation in Washington (“President Trump came through for Los Angeles,” March 4). While praising President Trump’s efforts in handling the aftermath of the Los Angeles wildfires, Jennings noted the executive order aimed at the Environmental Protection Agency to expedite debris removal. However, as he criticized what he called “pearl-clutching” Democrats, the Trump administration was actually busy dismantling both the EPA and environmental regulations at an alarming rate. It begs the question: Will the EPA be ready for the next disaster?
Constance Mallinson, Woodland Hills
To the editor:
I appreciate reading something positive about President Trump’s support for Los Angeles fire victims, showcasing federal leadership in an unprecedented cleanup driven by the EPA. California officials have even highlighted their successful collaboration with federal workers. While I don’t want to seem ungrateful, I struggle to recall another noteworthy achievement from Trump during the opening month of his second presidency.
Lynn Lorenz, Newport Beach
To the editor:
Los Angeles faces its worst fire disaster, and the president signs an order for federal assistance. What kind of political climate are we in when fulfilling a basic presidential duty merits such excessive praise in the L.A. Times’ opinion section?
Brian Kehlenbach, Long Beach
To the editor:
Jennings compares the cleanup time in L.A. with efforts following the Maui fires, noting L.A.’s impressive 30-day cleanup versus Maui’s 128 days. However, comparing California’s abundant resources and vast land with those of a small Pacific island like Maui is pointless unless the goal is merely to score political points instead of striving for a safer, more equitable society for all Americans.
Richard Flory, Newport Beach, Executive Director, USC Center for Religion and Civic Culture
To the editor:
Providing disaster recovery resources is a presidential duty—and, in this instance, a straightforward PR opportunity. The fire relief does little to challenge Trump’s tendency to prioritize his personal grievances and self-promotion over the welfare of Americans.
Joy Rockport, Valley Glen
To the editor:
People worried Trump wouldn’t aid California post-fire disaster. Why were we so concerned? Because he previously warned he might withhold help, making aid contingent on improved behavior. While I am grateful for the assistance we’ve received, I am equally grateful to Gov. Gavin Newsom for inviting Trump to witness the devastation firsthand. Newsom rose above Trump’s past criticisms of him and our state, acting with true statesmanship.
Ruth Silveira, Los Angeles
To the editor:
The White House might want to consider offering Jennings a prominent position. His skill at spinning narratives and glossing over certain details makes him an excellent candidate for the administration.
Doug Stokes, Duarte
