To the editor: It’s surprising to learn that former Representative Matt Gaetz from Florida, who was Donald Trump’s top pick for attorney general, has now been accused by the House Ethics Committee of routinely paying for sexual encounters and using illegal drugs, even involving a 17-year-old. This situation brings a critical point into focus: how does our upcoming president plan to vet the key people for his administration roles? When Gaetz was chosen for such a high-profile law enforcement position, why weren’t these serious red flags noticed? It leaves us questioning the thoroughness of this process.
Jack Nelson, Los Angeles
…
To the editor: Consider this as Step One: After nearly four years of thorough investigation, the House Ethics Committee has finally released its report detailing the allegations against Gaetz. Now, for Step Two, it’s time for Jack Smith and the Justice Department’s special prosecutor’s office to unveil their findings on the January 6th insurrection. If Trump has objections, he should be ready to testify under oath. It’s crucial to differentiate between what’s posted on Truth Social and the actual truth. The American people deserve to make informed decisions based on factual evidence.
Joel Pelcyger, Los Angeles
…
To the editor: According to the allegations by the House Ethics Committee, Gaetz managed to spend significant money on sex and drugs, all while on a congressional salary. Perhaps this implies that the president-elect’s Department of Government Efficiency should look into whether members of Congress are being overpaid. A pay cut might be worth considering if they can afford such extravagant expenditures.
June Thompson, Los Angeles
